On Friendship, Love, and What We Take for Granted
- Diella Yasmine

- Jan 11
- 3 min read

People often associate love with a romantic partner rather than with friends. Love seems to belong in that one box. For a long time, I accepted that idea without questioning it. But the more I think about it, the less it makes sense to me.
We tend to neglect the love we have for our friends because we assume they will stay, no matter what. They have seen us at our best and our worst. They know our flaws, our patterns, our bad days. Their presence feels steady, familiar, almost guaranteed. Because of that, we rarely question whether we should fight for them. We simply expect them to be there.
At the same time, when it comes to a romantic partner, we often tolerate pain we would never accept elsewhere. We justify emotional exhaustion, confusion, and heartbreak in the name of love. We convince ourselves that suffering is part of the process, that love must be hard to be real.
What confuses me is this: how can we be so willing to endure hardship for someone who, at one point, was a stranger, yet fail to fully appreciate those who have stayed with us through our ups and downs?
Psychology offers an explanation that feels uncomfortably accurate. Human beings are wired to pursue attachment that feels uncertain. When something feels unstable or unpredictable, our brain releases more dopamine, the same chemical linked to desire and motivation. Uncertainty keeps us engaged. It makes us try harder. That is why emotionally unavailable or inconsistent partners can feel more intense than they should.
Friendships, on the other hand, are often stable and secure. They do not trigger the same urgency. There is no chase. No fear of abandonment on a daily basis. Because of that, the brain reads them as safe, not exciting. Over time, we mistake safety for something less valuable.
There is also the idea of social conditioning. We are taught, directly and indirectly, that romantic love is the ultimate achievement. Movies, books, and even casual conversations reinforce the idea that finding a partner is the goal, while friendships are secondary, something that fills the space until romance arrives. Without realizing it, we internalize that hierarchy.
But when I look back at my own life, it is often my friends who held me together. They listened without trying to fix me. They stayed when I had nothing to offer. They celebrated small wins and sat with me in silence when words felt heavy. Their love did not demand suffering to prove its worth.
When I think about it honestly, the people who have stayed in my life the longest are not the ones who asked for proof of love. They were simply there. In ordinary moments. In difficult ones. Without spectacle or demand. And perhaps that is what I am still learning to value more fully.
Romantic love can be meaningful, deep, and transformative. I am not denying that. But I am questioning why we accept pain as a requirement for it, while treating friendship as something that does not need the same care, effort, or gratitude.
Maybe love should not be ranked at all. Maybe it does not belong in separate boxes labeled partner or friend. Maybe love is simply the act of showing up, consistently and honestly, for the people who choose us and whom we choose back.
Lately, I am trying to be more conscious of that. To show up better for my friends. To say thank you more often. To stop taking emotional safety for granted. To remember that love does not have to hurt to be real.
And maybe appreciating the love that already surrounds us is not settling. Maybe it is finally seeing clearly.



Comments